Mohammed Mohiuddin v. The Central Power Distribution Company Of
[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 5776 OF 2014 Between:
Mohammed Mohiuddin, S/o. Mohammed Yousufuddin, Aged 39 yrs, Occ Business, Rl/o. H. No. 8-2-17 81 27, Pratapnagar, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER ANO
1. The Central Power Distribution Company of, Andhra Pradesh Ltd. Rep. by its Chairman and MD, Hyderabad
2. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (operations), Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District
3. The Assistant Engineer (operations) Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the actions of Respondents in not installing the new service connection of electricity supply along with meter over Petitioners Property bearing Plot Nos. 814,815 and 816, B Block, in Survey No. 202, situated at Kondapur Village, Seri Lingampally Mandal and Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of regulations and Principles of Natural Justice and Article 21 of Constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 7179 OF 20'l4l Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to install new service connection of electricity supply along with meter over Petitioner's Property bearing Plot No's. 814,815 & B'16, "B"
Block, in Survey No. 202, situated at Kond apar Village, Seri Lingampally Mandal Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the main Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MIRZA SAFIULLA BAIG Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRt R.V|NOD REDDY, SC FOR TSGENCO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO.s776 of 2Ol4 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the respondent submitted cause in the writ petition does not survive.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh case, in the event of any cause survives in this writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Wri " Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT B!r.GlsTjnREv''
SECT]ON OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI MIRZA SAFIULLA BAIG, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI O.MANOHER REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI
3. One CC to SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSGENCO [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies PSK GJP ")- \\ //TRUE COPY//
I f HIGH COURT DATED:0411212023 STAT€ oF {
ORDER
a q:) t?. utt $8 o ,.
at WP.No.5776 of 2014 , O,. c DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
"y