M. Venkataramana v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.32800 of 2017 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the in-action on the part of the 3rd respondent in considering the representation made by the petitioner for regularization of the plot in question, in spite of the petitioner remitting an amount of Rs.18,65,000/- in terms of the scheme evolved in GO Ms.No.59, dated 30-12-2014 as being illegal, arbitrary and for issuance of appropriate consequential directions.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the representation said to have been made by the petitioner in that behalf and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J Dated: 20-11-2018 NRG

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.32800 of 2017 //WEB// Date: 20-11-2018 NRG