Dr.G.Sudershan Rao v. R.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IVIONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO: 1043 OF 2001 Appeal Under Section 100 of C.P.C. and Order 42 Rule 1 of C.P.C. aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 21-06-200,1 in A.S.No. 22 ot 1g9S on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge , Medak at Sangareddy preferred against the Judgment and decree dated 8-12-1994 in O.S.No. 70 of 1990 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Sangareddy Between:

Dr.G.Sudershan Rao S/o. G. Bagaiah , aged 64 66/D, Telephone Exchange Lane, Sangaieddy, years, Occ: R.tvl>F. R/o- H.No. 11District tvledak. ...APPELLANT AND R.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy S/o. Sangareddy, aged 65 years, Occ: Advocate Rt/o. H.No. 11-66/ N, Telephone & Exchange Lane, Sangreddy District Medak. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:SRl. MOHD GHULAM HUSSATN (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent:,SRl R. NARASIMHA REDDY The Court delivered the following: Judgment

THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE M' LAXMAN NO .1043 oF o1 GMENC:.

al is filed against the judgment and This Second APPe A.S.No'22 of 1995 on the decree dated 21'06'2001 Passed in District Judge' Medak at file of the Court of the I Additional SangareddY'

No rePresentatlon from aPPellant's side.

The the matter '

There was no failed to Pursue frorn aPPellant's side even on na .r4.2022 aPPellant representation the caPtion "for dismissal" '

Though the matter is listed under Hence, the Second ellant's side '

no rePresentatlon froP aPP Appeai is dismissed for non-prosecution'

aPPlications' iI 3.

As a sequel' pending miscellaneous stand closed'

sd/-K i$itlti$mR ( 1t't any, sha1l SECTION OFFICER I //TRUE COPYI/ - rec'rds) i g ggl*t+:rfmmffiu*#*i'

#

HIGFj COURT DATED:1810412022 1 g STAT€ ( ,+ lls \\;

\: "'.

o [ ? luL 2$[l * .1. ..

.;

nE7?2\ e ..,

ORDER

SA.No.1043 of 2001 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FORNON PROSECUTION.

b c.-.r