High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/1399/2017disposed of as infructuous

B. Vinutha v. The District Educational Officer,

2023-01-03N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

[32ss ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TR NO: 1399 OF 2017 Between:

B. Vinutha, W/o Jagan Mahan Reddy, Aged about 53 years, School Assts. Z.P.H.S. Gattuippalapally (V), Talakondapally Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. PETITIONER AND The District Educational Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District. The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad. The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal, Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not issuing the consequential posting orders to the applicant by implementing the orders of the 3rd respondent issued in Memo.No.21668/SE.Ser.lll/2013 dated 4.12.

2013 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, unjust and violation of constitutional provisions apart from declaring it as administrative indiscipline and consequently direct the respondents I and 2 to issue consequential posting orders posting the applicant to U.P.S. Kummariguda by implementing the orders issued by the 3rd respondent in Memo.No.2 1 668/5E.Ser.l I l/20'1 3 dated 4.12.2013. i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.1399 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken uir for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SDI. N. CHANDRA SEKH R RAO TRAR ANTAE ASSIST ecrbH FFICER /ITRUE COPY/I S \ To, "S:"'["'5"'$s.,teorreransanaroUr] i?W:EEi:]kHitr*1tt'iJf, TJ GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:0310112023 I FI.q ,( J o() t\

ORDER

I\l ?r]?l WP(TR).No.1399 of 2017 I t;

-:::a-'

DISMISSING ]'HE WRIT PETITION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

u5 @ CoP"cs MA.-- \r