← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2143/2016dismissed

B. Vimal Sukumar v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2016-03-23Raja Elango2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2143 OF 2016 ORDER:

This Criminal is filed by the petitioner, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings against him in STC No.616 of 2013 one the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile at Medak.

Heard and perused the material available on record. The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable under Section 14(2) of E.P.F. & M.P. Act 1952 r/w. para 76 (b) of E.P.C. Scheme, 1952.

When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted that the petitioner already approached this Court for quashing the proceedings in the above case by filing Crl.P. No.10209 of 2014, and this Court vide order, dated 15.09.2014, disposed of the said criminal petition directing the petitioner to submit his returns within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order and that the petitioner, without complying the said order, filed the present application for quashing the proceedings against him, which is not maintainable.

A perusal of the record discloses that the petitioner has already approached this Court by filing Crl.P. No.10209 of 2014 for quashing the proceedings against him in the above STC and this Court passed the following order on 15.09.2014:

"In the above circumstances, the petitioner herein is directed to submit his returns within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such submission, the respondents are directed to report the same to the Court below. On such report, the Court below is directed to dispose of the matter, in accordance with law."

Again, the petitioner filed the present application seeking the same relief, without complying with the direction issued in the earlier petition, which is not maintainable. Therefore, this Court is not inclined

to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________ RAJA ELANGO, J March 23, 2016.

KTL