← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/743/2018disposed of no costs

Smt M Sujatha v. State Of Telangana

2018-01-04M.Seetharama Murti3 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI WRIT PETITION No.743 of 2018 ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking verbatim the following relief: "For all the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Lr. No.3/C12/18911/2017 dt. 30-12-2017 of the 2nd respondent refusing to consider the application for construction of the building on Plot No. 795 in Survey No.44/1, at Matrusri Nagar, Miyapur , Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for the reason that LGC No.29 of 2006 is pending before the Special Court as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2 and 3 respondents to consider the application of the Petitioner for construction of residential building made under File No.3/C12/18911/2017 without reference to the pendency of LGC 29/2006 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 2.

I have heard the submissions of Sri Srinivas Karra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for the 1st respondent, and of Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for the respondents 2 & 3. I have perused the material record.

3.

At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents 2 & 3 are in agreement that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the orders, dated 15.03.2017, of this Court, in W.P.No.9035 of 2017 and dated 07.11.2017 in WP.No.37258 of

MSRM, J W.P.No.743 of 2018 2017. A copy of the order in the latter writ petition is placed on record.

4.

Having regard to the facts and submissions and for the reasons alike as were mentioned in the afore-stated orders, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner satisfying the requirement of Section 428 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, and after giving an undertaking that she would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event L.G.C. has to be decided against her, without reference to the letter, dated 31.10.2013, of the Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

Office is directed to enclose a copy of the order, dated 15.03.2017, passed in W.P.No.9035 of 2017 to this order. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________________ M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J Date: 4th January, 2018 KL

MSRM, J W.P.No.743 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI WRIT PETITION No.743 of 2018 Date: 4th January, 2018 KL