Ryagatla Mallesham v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3304 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 956 OF 2019 Between:
Ryagatla Mallesham, S/o: Ryagatla Nandam, aged about 30 years, H.No.367, R/o Kasulabad, Mardoddi Mandal, Siddipet District - 502 108. PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Medial AND Health, Secretariat, Hyderabad. District Collector, Siddipet, Siddipet District. The Superintendent, District Head Quarters Hospital, Siddipet, Siddipet District, 502 103 The District Medical and Health Officer, Siddipet District. Potula Gopal, S/o: Not Known to the petitioner, Aged 29 years, Fyo Mirdoddi village and lvlandal, Siddipet District - 502 108. RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ.
order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of tvlandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 to 4 in selecting the Candidates of Lab- Technicians Seven in Number without following the Roster is illegal, arbitrary, uniust and violation of A(icle 21 of the Constitution of lndta and consequently to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to select the petitioner as LabTechnrcran in the existing vacancy.
//// lA NO: 1 OF 2019 -/ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to select the petitioner as Lab-Technician in the existing vacancy, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. , Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARUNAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI S. KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITTO N NO.9s6 0F 2019 ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
2. On 07.03.2024 and 22.03.2024, there is no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the writ petition. 3.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs Miscellaneous petitrons, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SDI K. VEN AH ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri Karunakar Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI One CC lo Sri S. Krishna. Advocate{OPUCI i*o CCr to GP for Medical Health Family Welfare, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUTI Two CD Copies a TJ GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:2810312024 \a..
7< i ::t.
' o -')..
t,-'
---ll i.r ir\ l'1
ORDER
'.?
* .'t...
'\--',irr;|',;, WP.No.956 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.