← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLA/162/2011dismissed

v.

2024-09-23K.Surender3 pages

[ 3251 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 162 OF 2011 Criminal Appeal under Section 378 (4) & (5) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1 973 against the Judgment dated 05-02-201 0 made in Crl. Appeal No. 54 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the lAdditional Sessions Judge, Adilabad, preferred against the Judgment made in C.C. No. 839 of 2005 dated 24-04-2008 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Mancherial. Between:

K Rajesham, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 50 years, Occ. Tailor, R:/o. Kalyanikhani, Mandamarri, Adilabad Diskict

...Petitioner / 2nd Respondent / Gomplainant

AND

1. Kosari Ramana, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged 55 years, Occ. -, R/o. Hanuman Temple, Ramnagar, CCC: Naspur, Mandal Mancherial, Adilabad Diskict

...Respondent / Appellant / Accused

2. State of A.P., through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad

...Respondent

Counsel for the Appellant :

Sri V Subrahmanyam Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 :

The Additional Public Prosecutor The Court made the following Order :

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER Crl.A No.162 OF 201r ORDER:

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/corrplainant submits that appellant/accused died and the cause in the Appeal does not survive for adjudication a.nd has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Appeal is disnrissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaleous Petitions, pending il any, shall stand I clo sed.

Sd/- M. MANJULA DEPUTYEGISTRAR \ /ffRUE COPY/'

SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad

2. The Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Mancherial

3. One CC to Sri 'V Subrahmanyam, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies VA/S

HIGH COURT DATED:2310912024 -..:" '.

-t ,\;' tl iE s t4 ,,, ...

c O LJ a tt Ni 2fr21 ,+ ir:

ORDER

,/ CRLA.No.162 ot 2011 DISMISSING THE CRLA AS INFRUCTUOUS ^ w