← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/40840/2015disposed of no costs

Sri Ilindra Siva Guru Venkata Satyanarayana Gupta, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-12-16Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 40840 of 2015 BETWEEN Sri Ilindra Siva Guru Venkata Satyanarayana Gupta ... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 16.12.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:- Heard.

2. By this writ petition, petitioner approached this Court seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not entertaining any mortgage deed for registration, which the petitioner intended to make in respect of Flat No.G-

7, admeasuring 1690 sft (undivided and unspecified share of 22.50 sq.yds.,) in the ground floor of Block-A "Meridian Sea Shells Enclave", Near Governor Banglow, Visakhapatnam, as illegal.

3. Apparently, petitioner has not presented the document before the third respondent. Petitioner is at liberty to present the document and if such document is presented, the third respondent shall receive and process the same. The third respondent is further directed to receive and process the document in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908 and Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and if the document is in conformity with the provisions of the aforesaid enactments, thereafter, register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. It is also made clear that in the event of registering authority not being satisfied with the compliance under the Registration Act or the Stamp Act, appropriate refusal endorsement together with reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioner in terms of Section 71 of the Registration Act.

With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 16, 2015 LMV