Ambati Rama Rao, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.By Its Secretary To

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL WRIT PETITION No.7584 of 2016 Date:10.3.2016 Between:

Ambati Rama Rao, S/o Chennaiah ....Petitioner And:

The State of A.P., reptd by its Secretary to Government (SR), General Admn. (SR) Department, Hyderabad and five others.

.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. C.Srinivasa Baba Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 3: GP for Services (AP) Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 4: GP for Services (TS) Counsel for Respondent No.5: Mr. B.Narayana Reddy Asst. Solicitor General The Court made the following:

ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to set aside order, dated 10.02.2016, in Original Application No.371 of 2016 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal'). The petitioner, Warder in Central Prison, Cherlopally, Ranga Reddy District, was allocated to the State of Andhra Pradesh post bifurcation of the State. He questioned the same by way of the above-mentioned

O.A. before the Tribunal. He has sought for stay of his final allocation to the State of Andhra Pradesh in the said O.A. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has declined the interim relief by observing that final allocation of the petitioner to the State of Andhra Pradesh shall be subject to the final result of the O.A.

At the hearing, learned Government Pleader for Services (Telangana State), on instructions, submitted that in pursuance of the final allocation, the petitioner has already joined his post in the State of Andhra Pradesh and that, he is presently working in the said post. Mr. C.Srinivas Baba, learned counsel for the petitioner, has not disputed this submission. In view of the fact that final allocation was already given effect to in case of the petitioner, the application filed for interim relief before the Tribunal has become infructuous.

In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we feel that early disposal of the O.A. is needed in the interests of justice. Accordingly, the Tribunal shall dispose of the abovementioned O.A. within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Subject to the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.9678 of 2016 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous.

____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY ____________________ JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL 10th March 2016 DR