← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/35022/2016disposed of no costs

Tej Prakash Agarwal, v. State Of Telangana,

2016-10-31C.Praveen Kumar2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR W RI T PETI TI ON No. 3 5 0 2 2 of 2 0 1 6 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

2.

With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed with the following prayer:

'For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing respondent Nos.3 and 4 to act in accordance with law and to direction them to rectify the entry pertaining to the nature of the patta in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.32.00 guntas situated in Survey No.170/ 5, Budha Kalan Village, Bellampally Mandal, Mancherial District from that of Lavoni Patta to Patta, as per the proceedings of respondent No.3 in No.B/ 5557/ 2012, dated 11.06.2012 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fits and proper in the circumstances of the case'.

4.

Though various grounds are raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make fresh application carrying out the mistakes that have occurred in revenue records basing on the proceedings dated 11.06.2012.

5.

Learned Government Pleader for revenue submits that if such representation is made, the authorities may be directed to consider the same, in accordance with law.

6.

Having regard to the above, the present writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make fresh application before the second respondent seeking correction of mistakes which occurred in revenue records basing on the proceedings dated 11.06.2012, in which event, the District Collector-second respondent, shall consider the same and pass orders, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such application. 7.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JUSTI CE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR 31.10.2016, vhb