K N Bhangdia, Hyd v. V.V.Rajam, Hyd And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY GIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4701 OF 2015 Petition under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code,aggrieved by the Order dated.10.09.2015 passed in E.P. No.25 of 20'|.2 in O.S.No.168 ol 2004 on the file of X Additional Chief Judge City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. Between:

Kailash Narayan Bhangdia, S/o Late Sri Satyanarayan Bhangdia Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Nil, R/o H. No.14-6-57,Nagarkhana, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. ...REVl$tONER PETITIONER/JDR No.1 AND

1. V.V.Rajam, S/o Sri Venkataiah, aged about 70 years, Occ: Retired Govt.Servant, Fi/o H.No. 16-11-20165, Saleem Nagar Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

RESPONDENT No.1/DHR

2. National Stock Exchange of lndia Ltd., Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai, Rep., by its M.D./ Vice President (Respondent No.2 was not necessary party in E.P., as such in present revision also it is not necessary party) ...RESPONDENT No.2/JDR No.2 l.A. NO: 1 OF 20'ls(C RPMP. NO: 6193 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated. 10-09-2015, thereby staying the Execution of warrant of Arrest passed in E.P.No.25 of 2012 on the file of X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Pending disposal of the main CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. TANGEDA DAYANANDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: P KESHAVA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE ;RI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWAF.A REDDY CIVIT.' RE'rISION PETITION NO.4701 0F 2015 ORDER:

None appt a I s on behalf of the revision lretilic rrr:r' This Civii Revision )etition is frled assailing lll ordr' s dated 10.09.20i5inEPNo.25 of 2Ol2 inOS'No'168 of 2-0(t4 rnthe file of X Additior,zr Chief Judge, City Civil Court at tl1 deI abad' As per the case status information, the said Execul-i'lr i Pt:trtion was clispos,:d of as dismissed as not pressed on 25 O'l '2016 In view of the dism is;a[ of the said Execution Petiliort as no cause survives, tLris Ci 'il Revisi<>n Petition is dismissed as ir lr uctuous' In the circumsti rllses of the case, there shall bc no ')r der as to theCoStS.Mis<ellal-reousapplications,ifanypel-r.1ieg,shall stands closed.

SdA N CHANI)I{A SiEKHAR RAO ASSISI'ANT REG\STRAR .. \-.., , .\ \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. The X Additio ra1 Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad i. o;;'itil;'S rr iAr.rcroA DAYANANDA RAo, Advocat': oPrJCl S. On" CC; to SI ll. P KESHAVA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPi -'s PR /

HIGH GOU RT DATED:3011212022 ,/,, ,/::

j,',-1

ORDER

CRP.No.4701 o12015 DISMISSIN(i CRI ,\S ]NFRTICTUOUS @ ( fr,ttr \ a1 L>