M/S Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18202 OF 2008 DATED: 06.06.2016 Between:

M/s. Pattana Nivasula Hakkula Sadhana Samithi and another ... Petitioners and The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ... Respondents

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18202 OF 2008 PC: (per the Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners, in the present Writ Petition, seek the following relief:

"For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring action of the 2nd respondent in selling/disposing the lands without making housing schemes as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, without jurisdiction ultra vires the provisions of A.P.H.B. Act 1956 and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to consequentially set aside the notification issued for the sale of following lands i.e. Bowenpally 2.00 acres, Nizampet Road 1.20 acres, Thokatta 1200 Sq.yds, Alwal 3993 Sq.yds, Girmapur 10.90 acres, Muneerabad 7.40 acres, Marredpally 13.00 acres, Bandlaguda 13.45 acres, Bandlaguda 5.30 acres, by the 2nd respondent pursuant its E-Auction notification posted on its website either on 25.08.2008 or any subsequent date and to pass such other order or orders or direction or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

Mr. M. Brahma Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions submits that as of today, respondent No.2 do not propose to auction the land in question.

His statement is recorded and accepted.

In the circumstances, nothing further survives in the Writ Petition.

Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of. All contentions of the petitioners are kept open with liberty to take appropriate remedy, if circumstances so demand. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ 6th JUNE, 2016.

_________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J kvni