Sri. Beeda Ravi Chandra v. Sri Mutyala Bala Rami Reddy,
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5026 OF 2014 ORDER:
The present revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking extension of time for complying with the order passed in I.A. No.32 of 2012 in C.M.A. No.32 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Nellore.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein filed Tr.O.P. No.764 of 2008 under Section 24 of C.P.C. seeking transfer of O.S. No.318 of 2008 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore to the Court of Principal Senior civil Judge, Nellore for trial along with O.S. No.343 of 2008 pending on its file or vice versa. The said application was allowed on 18.06.2009. While things stood thus, O.S. No.343 of 2008 was dismissed for default since the plaintiff could not file the chief-affidavit within time. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A. No.184 of 2010 seeking restoration, which was also dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, he filed C.M.A. No.32 of 2010, which was allowed on 04.07.2012 on condition of payment of Rs.500/- to other side on or before 10.07.
2012 and further directed both the parties to appear before the trial court on 10.07.2012 and cooperate with the trial to dispose of both the suits as early as possible. However, the same could not be complied with within time, as such the petitioner immediately filed I.A. No.32 of 2012 in C.M.A. No.32 of 2012 seeking extension of time. It is said that the I.A. No.32 of 2012 is pending before the District Court but the same was being adjourned from time to time for one or the other reason while the other matter O.S. No.318 of 2008 is being posted for trial.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that great
prejudice will be caused if both the suits are not tried together and that if two weeks time is granted she will take steps to get appropriate orders in accordance with law in I.A. No.32 of 2012 in C.M.A. No.32 of 2010.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the C.R.P. is disposed of by staying the proceedings in O.S. No.318 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore for a period of two weeks from today only. Meanwhile, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps in disposal of I.A. No.32 of 2012. It is made clear that no extension of time would be granted.
Accordingly, the C.R.P. is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel to it, miscellaneous petitions pending if any in this C.R.P., shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Dt:20.01.2015 GM