M/S.Ghena Projects Pvt. Ltd v. State Of Telangana And 3 Others

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No. 1128 of 2020 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents, particularly the 4th respondent in not conducting survey and demarcation of the land under Sy.Nos.65/2 & 65/3, situated at Khanapur Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the application of the petitioner dt.15.07.2019 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to conduct survey and demarcation and fix boundary stones surrounding the aforesaid land of the petitioner.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that though the petitioner is having only Ac.3 of land in Survey No.65/2 and 65/3, he is claiming to survey the entire land of Ac.24.27 guntas. When the same is pointed out to learned counsel for the petitioner, he could not dispute the same.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the survey may be confined only to the extent of Ac.3.00 in Survey Nos.65/2 & 65/3, owned by the petitioner. He also submits that this Court disposed of similar batch of writ petitions vide WP.No.4811 of 2011 and batch dt.28.04.2016. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said order directing the respondent-authorities to consider the application of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.3.00 in Survey No.65/2 and 65/3, situated at Khanapur Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy

District, after receiving necessary charges, keeping in view the Circulars vide Rc.No.N1/1408/07, dated 13-07-2007, Rc.No.N1/6543/99, dated 25-07-2001 and Circular vide Rc.No.N2/1741/2010, dated 18-05-2010 and also in terms of the judgment in W.A.No.618 of 2013 and also keeping in view the provisions of Sections 89, 89-A and 92 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli and take necessary action within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision to the parties. It is open for the petitioner to prefer appeal against the said order, if it is aggrieved in terms of circulars referred to above. No order as to costs. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

__________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 21.01.2020 tk

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 1128 of 2020 21.01.2020 tk