Haneef Khan, Nizamabad Dist. v. The Joint Collector, Nizamabad And 3 Others

[ 3302 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 12578 OF 2008 Between:

HANEEF KHAN, S/o. Gudu Khan Agriculture Fl/o. Suleman Nagar, Ranampally Gram Panchayat, Kotgir Mandal, Nizamabad District. ...PET!TIONER AND The Joint Collector, Nizamabad.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad, District. The Mandal Revenue Officer i Tahsildar, Kotgir Mandal, Nizamabad District. Smt. Geetha Been, D/o. Jagjeevan Dhanji, rep. by her aunt, Naval Bin Shah, W/o. Late Laxmichan, Rl/o- Anand Nagar, Ranampally Village, Kotgir Mandal, Nizamabad District.

4.

..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the orders in Case No.A212775105, daled 15.12.2007 of the 2nd respondent and the orders in Proceedings No. D2l'135/2008, dated 31 .03.2008 of the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the Provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land Pattadar Passbook Act and the Rules and consequently set aside the same.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 1620s oF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the Agriculture land to an extent of Ac.0.36 gts in Sy.No.224 of Suleman Nagar, Kotgir Mandal, Nizamabad District by suspending the orders in Case No.A2l2775lO5, dt. 15 12.2OO7 of the 2nd respondent and the orders in Proceedings No.D2l135/2008, dt. 31.03.2008 ofthe 1st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel forthe Respondents No.1to3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondents No.4:

-- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.L257a of 2OO8 ORDER:

This petition is coming for hearing since 2008. On 04.12.2024, when the matter was ca,lled, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that thc petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case 2.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/,3"Lrt,. Ttrere shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this writ petition, shall stand closed sDI-v. KAVTTHA ASSTSTANT REGISTRAR I I/TRUE COPY// ECNON OFFICER To, One CC to SRI' P PRABHAKAR REDDY Advocate tOPUCi One CC to SRI' BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) [OPUCI Two CD CoPies KKS BS z', I

HIGH COURT DATED:0210x 12025 ST;r 14 10 t{nq ?025 i \o t

ORDER

WP.No.12578 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS b ,/A tVh ztr