Mullapudi Rama Rao, v. The State, Station House Officer,

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANIS Crl.R.C.M.P.No.4237 of 2014 in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.4238 of and Crl.R.C.No.1721 of 2007 Common Order:

The de-facto complainant and his counsel, Sri Ch. Venkateswara Rao are present. The accused and his counsel, Sri M. Pitchaiah are present.

Heard both sides.

The submission of both sides is that both the parties have amicably settled the disputes between them and they have entered into a compromise and therefore, permission may be accorded to them for entering into compromise and compromise may be recorded and the petitioner may be acquitted.

Having regard to the above said submission and following the decision reported in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another[1], compromise is recorded in terms of accompanying compromise petition and consequently the judgment dated 21.03.2007 in S.C. No.226 of 2006 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Baptla is set aside and the petitioner is acquitted.

Accordingly, Crl.R.C. M.P. 4237 and 4238 of 2014 are ordered In the result, the criminal revision is allowed. The judgment, dated 21.03.2007 in S.C. No.226 of 2006 on

the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Baptla, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.113 of 2007 by the V Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, is set aside.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed.

________ ANIS, J 26-02-2015 bv [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303)