← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/1050/2018dismissed

N. Vijay Mohan Rao v. Sriram City Union Finance Limited

2018-02-21V Ramasubramanian,T.Amarnath Goud2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1050 OF 2018 Date:21.02.2018 Between:

Mr. N.Vijay Mohan Rao S/ o.Late Mr. N.Jagan Mohan Rao, Saged about 38 years, Occ: Business, R/ o.H.No.1-8-85/ 1, C.C.I. Road, Tandur.

... Petitioner Vs.

M/ s.Sriram City Union Finance Limited, Branch at Mahaboobnagar, represented By GPA Holder Mr. K.V. Ramana S/ o.M.r K. Appala Konda, aged about 52 years, R/ o.Hyderabad and others.

... Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri B.Sashidhar Counsel for Respondents : None Gist :

Head Note :

Cases Referred : Nil

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1050 OF 2018 ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J) Aggrieved by an ex-parte order of attachment of movables granted by the Executing Court, an award debtor has come up with the above revision.

2. Heard Mr. B. Shashidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. According to the petitioner, he has already filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for setting aside the Award. We do not know whether the said petition is within time or not. In any case, if a valid application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been made, the petitioner should move that Court for interim orders as against the award.

4. Insofar as the grievance of the petitioner that the order of attachment has been passed ex-parte, is concerned, there is a distinction between an order of attachment under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC and Order 21 Rule 54 CPC. Therefore, the appropriate course of action for the petitioner is only to move the Executing Court for raising the order of attachment if he had a valid objection to the plea for attachment.

5. With the above liberty, the revision is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

_____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ___________________ T. AMARNATH GOUD, J February 21, 2018 KTL