Anjaiah Daida v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.81 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 01.

05.02.2024 CJ & JAK, J I.A.No.1 of 2024 Ms.

Pushpinder Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in I.A.No.1 of 2024, leave is granted.

In the result, I.A.No.1 of 2024 is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J I.A.No.2 of 2024 Ms. Pushpinder Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the

application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient cause on condonation of delay of 324 days in filing the appeal is made out.

In the result, delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the interlocutory application is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J I.A.No.3 of 2024 Ms. Pushpinder Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, requirement of filing the certified copy of the order is dispensed with.

In the result, I.A.No.3 of 2024 is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J

WRIT APPEAL No.81 of 2024 Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(Vide Separate Judgment) (B/o.) KL