Konda Srinivas Goud v. District Forest Officer,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRlT PETITION NO: 16875 OF 2011 Between:

1. Konda Srinivas Goud, S/o Bhooma Goud R/o Kalladi (P)' Makloor (M), Nizamabad District.

2. T. Maruthi, S/o Anjaiah 6-25-13412, Gurbabadi Road, Nizamabad District.

3. G, Mallesh, Sio Sangamallu Kalladi (P) Makloor (M), Nizamabad District. PETITlONERS AND District Forest OFficer, Vermi Road, Nizamabad District. Forest Range Officer, Mamidipally (V) (M), Nizamabad District. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or nature of writ more particularly one int eh nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent interfering the petitioner agricultural land is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the petitioner's agricultural lands situated at Survey Nos. 559, in Kalladi (V) (M), Makloor, Nizamabad District. 1.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.

NO: 20274OF 20111 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the agricultural activities of the petitioner's land in survey No.s. 559, in Kalladi (V) (M), Makloor, Nizamabad District pending disposal fo the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: MS. ISHRATH BEGUM FOR SRl. G. RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.16875 of 2OlL ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms. Ishrath Begum, learned counsel representing Sri G. Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, One CC to SRl. G. RAVI IVOHAN Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Forests, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies 3.

CHR GJP C,f

HIGH COURT 9.;ATE \i ,f DATED:2810312023 r,. i -. ,.

'i ,, \l\ NtI t1 ,,)

ORDER

W.P.No.16875 ot 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS L