Shaik Salawuddin v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.591, 602, 644, 645 of 2025 COMMON ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1 in C.C.Nos.07 of 2023, 63 of 2021, 64 of 2021 and 59 of 2022 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, on bail, the present Criminal Petitions are filed.

2.

Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Bodla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial court issued a Non-Bailable warrant to the petitioner for non-appearance, following which the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody and produced before the trial court. He further submitted that, till date, no charges have been framed against the petitioner. Learned counsel assured that the petitioner will regularly appear before the trial court.

Therefore, counsel prayed that the court grant bail to the petitioner by allowing these criminal petitions. 4.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that because of non-appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court, issued warrants and he was remanded to judicial custody. Further, there is no progress in the case and the petitioner is not co-operating with the trial Court, as such, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petitions. 5.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the crime is of the year 2019 and C.Cs are of the year 2021, 2022 and 2023. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the remand of the petitioner to the judicial custody, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

ii.

The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the trial Court in concluding the trial by attending each and every occasion.

iii.

In case, the petitioner fails to attend the Court on the specified date, the trial Court is at liberty to take necessary action against the petitioner.

iv.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

6.

Accordingly, these Criminal petitions are allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 27.01.2025 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 591, 602, 644, 645 of 2025 Date: 27.01.2025 SAI