M.Pochaiah v. The Presiding Officer And 3 Others

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITI ON NO: 23794 0F 2009 Between M.POCHAIAH, S/o M.Mallaiah Ex.Helper T.No.534, Canteen Section HMT Ltd Balanagar,Hyderabad Chintal, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, Labour Court-l,HyderaM-1

2. M/s Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd, rep.by its chairman and Managing Director HMT Bhavan,59 Bellary Road, Bangalore 3.TheGeneralManager,MachineToolsDivsionHMTLtdHMTTownship Post,Jeedmitela, R.R District,Hyderabad

4. The General Manager, Press Division HMT Ltd HMT Township Post,Jeedmitela, R.R District,Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent and issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the Award passed by the '1 st respondent in lD No 1 53 of 2004, dt 19-8-2008 published on 24-10-2008, holding the same as illegal' unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary and perverse l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 30908 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct

the 3d respondent to engage the Petitioner on daily wage basis, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms K VANI REP. SRl. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI D RAVISHANKAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'B LE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO.23794 OF 2OO9 ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Vani, representing learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication.

2.

Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ATISARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Al SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. One CC to SRl. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO, Advocate.[OpUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR LABOUR,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to SRl. D RAVTSHANKAR RAO, Advocate.[OpUC]

4. Two CD Copies SB g

HIGH COURT DATED:0810912023 L SlATL c -1 ,J $tlNtl t, \1 :l -t ,/,t

ORDER

WP.No.23794 of 2009 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS G)oq,s *ffi