Pothuganti Ravinder v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P.NOS.1345 AND 1705 OF 2020 COMMON ORDER The case of the petitioners is that they are the owners and possessors of the subject land i.e., the petitioner in W.P.No.1345 of 2020, is the owner and possessor of the subject land in an extent of Ac.0.35 gts. in Sy.Nos.22/ 3, 23 and 24, and the petitioner in W.P.No.1705 is the owner and possessor of the subject land in an extent of Ac.0-14 gts. in Sy.No.22/ 1. Both the said lands are situated at Bollaram village, Vemulawada Rural Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents without following due process of law, are interfering with their possession.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submits that the petitioners have no title in respect of land covered under Sy.No.24, and in respect of land in Sy.Nos.22/ 3, 23 and 22/ 1, respondents are not interfering with the possession of the petitioners over the said land. The learned counsel for the petitioners disputed the above submission that the petitioners have no title in respect of the land covered under Sy.No.24.

This court under the writ jurisdiction cannot decide the title issue in respect of the land in Sy.No.24 However, recording the above submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, writ petitions are disposed of directing that if the respondents require the subject land of the petitioners in

Sy.Nos.22/ 3, 23 and 22/ 1, they are at liberty to take possession of the same by following due process of law.

Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

-------------------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE:31-01-2020 avs