A.Bhaskar, v. State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.5 3 0 of 2 0 1 7 ORDER:

Heard Mr. T. Sujan Kumar for petitioner and the Assistant Government Pleader (Civil Supplies) for respondents. 2.

The petitioner challenges proceeding No.B3/ 19952/ 2016 dated 01.11.2016 suspending the authorization of petitioner for F.P. Shop No.4, Madhapur Village, Makloor Mandal, Nizamabad District. The principal objection of petitioner is that the proceeding impugned in the writ petition is passed without conducting enquiry, as directed by this Court in G. DURGA SRI NI VAS RAO v . STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 1 read with CCS.Memo.No.21/ 100/ 2015-AD1.PPCCS dated 28.09.2015. 3.

Admittedly, the petitioner has an effective remedy of appeal against proceeding impugned in the writ petition. This Court, on the ground of availability of alternative and effective remedy of appeal, is not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to petitioner to file an appeal within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If the appeal is filed, as directed in the instant order, the appellate authority calls for the record from the second respondent, examines the issue and passes orders expeditiously, preferably, within four (4) weeks thereafter, in the light of the principles laid down by this Court in G. DURGA SRI NI VAS RAO's 1 2015 (6) ALD 359

case (1 supra / and as communicated in the memo dated 28.09.2015). As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J January 5, 2017 DSK