Samreddy Janga Reddy v. Syndicate Bank

[ 34481 ]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 139 oF 2019 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 3i-iO-20i8 made in OS.No.458 of 2O'13 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar. Between :

Samreddv Janqa Reddv, s/o. S.Achi Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o -H.No. 8-i-21130, Kishan Kumar Enclave, Karmanghat; Saroor Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

,..Appellan(Defendant No.3) AND 1 . Svndicate Bank. a Bodv Corporate Constituted and functioning Under the ginfins Companies (Acquisition and Transfer Of Undertakings) |ct.1970' having Tts office Situated at Manipal in U-dupi District, Karnataka State' with Oranches amongst other places et JSN Branch, Hyderabad, represented by its GPA and Seiior Branih Manager Smt. R. Anuradha.

...Respondent(Plaintiff)

2. Lakshmi Narsimha Rao, s/o A.Laxman Rao, aged about 55 years, Ocrupation. Business, r/o. 11-9-95/1, Road No. 1, Laxmi Nagar Colony, Kothdpet, Hyderabad-35.

3. Smt. A.Jvothi, Wo.A.L.Narasimha Rao,aged about 48 years, Occupation. Housewife, R/o. 11-9-95/1, Road No. 1, Laxmi NagarColony' Kothapet' Hyderabad-35.

Cl-he Respodent 2 and 3 not necessary parties to this appeal)

...Respondents (Defendant Nos.l & 2)

tA NO: 1 oF 2019 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings including the execution of the decree passed in O.S.tto.+SA of jOtS dt.3a-10-2018 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District, at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main appeal, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri G.Sudhakar Reddy (Not Present) Counsel for the ResPondents : --- The Court made the following : JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLT JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO APPEAL SUIT No.139 of 2O19 JUDGMENT:

It is mentioned in the cause title of the appeal that respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not necessarJi parties. 2.

None appeared for the appellant since 29.03.2019. Notice to respondent No.1 is ordered on O4.O9.2O23. Since then, the matter has been adjourned from time to time. Proof of service of respondent No.l is not filed inspite of passing conditional order on O2.O9.2O25. It appears tJrat the appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. 3.

In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 4.

Interim order and miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal Suit shall stand closed. SDI- P GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TTRUE COPY"

SECTION OFFICER to',,. -n" r Additionar Senior civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar.(with records if any)

2. One cC to Sii G.Sudhakar Reddy, Advocate [OPUCI 4"rtJU"

cD coPies

HIGH COURT DATED:0611012025 ( f'

T R o T4 S o l.l R 20?t * *

JUDGMENT

AS.No.139 of 2019 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR DEFAULT ( ).b 1b v