Sonnla Narayana. v. Dist.Collector Govt.A.P.Medak.And2 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO:924 OF 2001 Aopeal Under Section 100 C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated: r5.oS.ZOOt made in A.S. No. 1'1 of 1996 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. Perferred ag-ainst the- Judgment and Decree in O'.S. Uo. 2O7 of 1987 Daied: 27 .02.1996 on the file of the Court of the District Muniseff at Sangareddy.

Between:

aoed about 46 vears, Occ:

Sangareddy Maridal, Medak '1 . Sonnla Narayana, S/o. Buchaiah, Agriculture, Rl/o. Klavakunta Village District.

...APPELLANT/ APP ELLANT/PLAINTIFF AND

1. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by District Collector, Medak District at SangareddY.

2. Jiont Collector, Madak at Sangareddy.

3. Mandal Revenue Officer, Sangareddy, IVedak District. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS For the Appellant: SRl. A BICHAIAH, ADVOCATE (NOT PRESENT) For the Respondents: GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO.924 OF 2OO1 JUDGMENT:

This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.08.200 1 in A.S.No.11 of 1996 on the lile of the Court of the District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. No representation from appellant's side. The appellant failed to pursue the matter. There was no representation from appellant's side even on O4.O4.2O22. Though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", no representation from appellant's side. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

a.) As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

I SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JIONT REGISTRAR ,,., (-ll) //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.

2. The District Muniseff at Sangareddy.

3. Two CCs to the GP For Arbitration, High Court at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri. A. Bichaiah, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy.

LS $'{u-

I I HIGH COURT DATED:18/0412022 l'

J I ri ?

6. 11 r,,* ?$rl .{* ,'y \=*;

ORDER

SA.No.924 ot 2001 DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION.

'v.- k