C. Parvathamma v. The District Collector,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
l [ 33021 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 19383 OF 2010 Between:
Smt c.Parvathamma, wo. Venakatesh, Labourer Fi/o. H.No.g-2-2g3tg2tF lBsNtEl 183, Film Nagar, Bhagath Singh Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. .....PETITIONER AND 'l . The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad
2. Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division.
3. The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad.
1. I," Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Hvd.
(Respondent No.4 and 5 are impleaded as per Court Order dated 13-g2010 in W.P.M.P.No.25335 of 2010) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents in demolishing house of petitioner No. B-2-293t82lF/BSN/E/1g3, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills is illegal and unconstitutional and consequen y direct the respondents reconstruct the house to put back the petitioner in that house while paying damages after setting aside the orders of the Tahsildar Shaikpet, dated 27.5.2010.
l.A.NO:1 OF 201O(WPMP. NO: 24553 OF 2010) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from preventing the petitioners from enjoying the house property No. B-2-293l82lF/BSNiE/183, Film Nagar, Bhagath Singh Colony, Jubilee Hills belonging to the petitioner in any manner including the allotment or giving away possession to any 3'd parties.
|.A.NO:3 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 25659 OF 2010) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from preventing the petitioner from enjoying the house property belonging to the petitioner in any manner. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the lmplead Respondent No.4 :
G.P. FOR GENERAL AOMINISTRATION Counsel for the lmplead Respondent No.5 : SRI MIDDE ARUN KUMAR The Court made the following ORDER
I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH lIIRIT PETITION No.19383 of 2O10 ORDER:
1.
This Writ Petition is hled to questioning the action of the respondents in demolishing the house of the petitioner bearing Il.No.8-2-293l82lF/BSN/Ell83, Filmnagar, Bhagath Singh Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and sought a direction to the respondents to reconstruct the house and purt back the petitioner in the subject house by setting aside the orders dated 27.O5.2O1O passcd by the Rcspondent No'3'
2.
Heard the learned Counsel lor the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader flor Revenue and Sri Midde Arun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for the respondents Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, thc learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that they have llled Memo in the Registry in USR
No.13O92I/2024 on 31.12.2024 statirrg thar a{tcr filing the writ petition the appeal lilect by thc petitioner against the eviction order under [,and Encroachmcnt ulct dated 27.O5.2O10 passed by the responrlent l,lo.3 \ ra.s dismissed on 10.02.201g vide Nc.Ri I 744 /2A16. Against the same, t_he pr:titioner fileC R-t:,.,ision befcft: the Joint Collector, Hyderabad ancl the samc \^,as numbered as file No.ll7 /31699/2}lg and the sanre is penCing. 4.
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that at the time of admission this Court granted ir.rterim order on 06.08.20 1O and requested to protect the interest of the petitioner till disposal ol thc Re,,,ision Petition hled by the petitioner.
5. In view of the submission maclc b_y the learned Counsel lor the petitioner, without going into merits, this u,rit petition is disposed of directing the rc.spondents not to dispossess petitioner from the subject property till disposal of the Revision perition No.E7l3 1699 l2OIg flled lry the petitionc:r against t hr: ordcr in
Proc.No.B/ 1744l2016 dated 10.02 -2018. No order as to costs.
As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. Sd/. T. TIRUMA DEVI ASSISTANT R TRAR /ITRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER to ,. a* District Collector, Hyderabad District' N.ampally Station Road' Hyderabad' i. fn" R"u"nu" Divisional officer' Secunderabad Division'
5. fn" Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Hy-derabad. .
+. fn" Chief Secretary, Govt of A P'' Secretariat' Hvderabad'
5. The Commissioner,'Ci""6ifrVO"iabad lrlunicipal Corporation'.Hyderabad'
6. Two CCs to Op tor ne'enu"' Higt' Court ior the State of Telangana at i HYderabad. [OUTj
7. Two ccS to GP for General Administraion' High court for the state of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT] one ic to SRIk.S.MURTHY, Advocate [oPUC] -- . o;; aa io inr rtilooe ARUN KUMAR' Advocate [oPUC] 8I 0.Two CD Copies o SA MP
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212024 1 HE STAI.
6 <JA ( $(
ORDER
WP.No.19383 of 2010 0 7 ilAR 2025 a I t \, DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.
D,\rf w