← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/1921/2021disposed of as infructuous

Osman Pasha v. The State Of Telangana

2021-09-06B.Vijaysen Reddy3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD- (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 1921 OF 2021 Between:

Osman Pasha, S/o. Mahaboob Ali,aged 28 years, Occ- PC 1462, Hd Qr Cox 1oth Bn TSSP Beachpally Jogulamba Gadwal District Telangan, ...rar,r,O*a* AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep, by its Principal Secretary for Home Department fS Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State DGP Office Hyderabad

3. The Commandant, 1Oth Bn TSSP Beachpally Telangana ...RESpONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs more particularly in the nature of writ of It4andamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in taking steps to terminate the service of the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned show cause nolice RC No. A2120110012020 dt.28.12.2020 of the 3rd respondent though the punishment of PPI for One year, and censure for the alleged periods of absence in the impugned show cause notice RC No. A2l20l10012020 d1.28.12.2020 of the 3rd respondent and without waiting for the orders from second respondent on the representations of the petitioner for grant of relaxation as illegal arbitrary, high handed and cannot be justified in the eye of law.

lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to pass any orders in pursuance of the show cause notice RC No. A2l20l10012020 dt.28.12.2020 till the 2nd respondent pass an orders on the representations of the petitioner dt. 9.1 .2021 and 23.1 .2021 in the interest of justice and pa ss Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. RAMGOPAL RAO, PROXY COUNSEL SRI CH. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.1921 of 2O21 ORDER:

1.4r. M. Ramgopal Rao, learned proxy counsel appearing for learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and no further orders are required. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/. V. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G, -|.-- SECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY// To,

1. One CC to Sri. Ch. Srinivas, Advocate IOPUC]

2. One CC to Sri. M. Ramgopal Rao, Proxy Counsel IOPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies

5. One Spare Copy sln TP Z z*'"-

HIGH COURT DATED: 0610912021 \ 9,9 (l S-rATE i L?TtPrt$ C) lt +

ORDER

P n!) WP.No.1921 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WP, AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

r*,.4t .6 \ v)