K.S.B. Ali v. Sri S.V. Prasad

[ 34451

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1558 OF 2010 The contempt case is filed under sections 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act, seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order in W.A. No. 1164 of 2009.

Between:

K.S.B. ALl, S/o K.S.Z. Ali (ln representative capacity of 2 branches of Legal Heirs of Lata Nawab Nusrat Jung Bahadur) ...PETITIONER AND

1. Sri S.V. Prasad, Chief Secretary Representing the State of AP Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

2. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department L-Block, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad- 22

3. The Chief Commissioner Land Administration-cum-, Commissioner Land Revenue Board of Revenue Buildings Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad

4. The Collector and District Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District Collectorate, Adjacent to Global Hospital, Saifabad, Hyderabad- 4

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer,, Chevella Division, R.r. District R.D.Os Office, Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District.

6. The Mandal Revenue Officer,, Rajendranagar, R.R.District

7. Sri G. Ravinder, Secretary,, The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority 3rd Floor, GHMC Buildings, West Marredpally, Secunderabad rep by its Secretary, R2 is impleaded as per Court order dated 31/3/2009 in WPMP No. 4917 of 2009 (R2 to 6 are not necessary) { ...RESPONOENTS

// Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. R K G BHATTA Counsel for the Respondent No.'t: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL / Counsel for the Respondents No.7 : V NARASIMHA GOUD, SC for GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER

/i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAI)A c.c.No.r568 0F 2010 ORDER: Per the Hon'bLe Si Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauiti) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had informed this Court that the cause in the contempt case does not survive for adjudication.

2.

In view of the said submission, the Contempt Case is disrnissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd,- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY/'

To,

1. One CC to SRI R K G BHATIA, Advocate [OPUCI

2. One CC to SRI THE ADVOCATE GENERAL' Advocate IOPUCI \

3. One CC to SRl. V NARASIMHA GOUD' SC for GHMC IOPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies MIN/PSL

HIGH COURT DATED:17104/2025 ,,,L > 'Af€ ,,4 '( ) ll l!

ll J i Jt]L ts .t'/ t 1I t)

ORDER

CC.No.1568 ol 2010 I /-rl / a7-zAr CONTEMPT IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS