Ajay Raj Singh , Durgesh Singh v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 592 OF 2021 Between:

Ajay Raj Singh @ Durgesh Singh, S/o. Pratap Singh, AND ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 State of Telangana, through SHO, PS Excise, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad, Represented by the Public Prosecutor ...RES'oNDENT/..M'LA'NANT Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner / Accused No.5 in the event of arrest in Crime COR.No.3B9 of 2O2O on the file of Police Station, Excise, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri UMESH SINGH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G, SRI DEVI CRIM AL PETITIoN No.592 OF 2O2l ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 43g of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ,Cr.p.CJ, is filed by the petitioner/Accused No.S for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.3g9 of 2O2O of Dhoolpet Prohibition and Excise Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offence punishable under Section 8 (c) read with 20 (b)(ii) (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, I9g5 (for short, 'NDPS Act).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ Accused No.S and the learned Additional public prosecutor representing the respondent/ State. Perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent of the offence alleged against him; that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution; that the respondent-police have falsely implicated the petitioner in the present case and ultimately, prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Learned Additional Public prosecutor opposed the petition. 5.

As seen from the contents of the First Information Report, total 38.5 kgs., of Ganja was recovered from the possession of accused No.2, who purchased the same from accused No.3, who in turn trying to sell the same to the present petitioner/ accused No.5

6.

Thus, in view of nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the petitioner/A.S is directed to surrender before the Court concerned within a period of ten (1o) days from today and move an application for regular baii, after giving prior notice to the Public Prosecutor concerned. If any such application is filed, the said application shall be considered in accordance with law.

With above observations, the Criminal Petition is dismissed' Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand closed.

sd/-NcNAU?Xt(rs.-[HSrEiR 4o //TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To 1 r h e I Ad d i tio n a r c h iet.v :I,"f_"Ji:T#!Si gti" xlt",.,#[,13 T,,li3 ;. o, o 3 Il,? ?if iJ- I'J Ei,,? r"J'?; "?ili'

r i oi' H r g i'. c o "t o o LoJ"t to Sri Umesh Singh' Advocate (oPUC)

5. Two CD CoPies Kj \ \)*/--

HIGH COURT DATED:0910212021 1HE SI4 14:

i t ) o (>Zo 22tEB1An

ORDER

-\ * t CRLP.No.592 of 2021 DISMISSING THE CRL.P.

@ {uc \ w