← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/11799/2011dismissed no costs

Smt. Vasam Tulashamma Nalgonda Dist. v. The Superintendent Of Police Nalgonda Dist. And 2 Otrs.

2015-06-25Sanjay Kumar2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.11799 of 2011 ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner in this case was that the police authorities were inactive upon her complaint dated 10.04.2011. By way of the said complaint, the petitioner alleged that the Tahasildar, Nalgonda Mandal, Nalgonda District, the 3rd respondent herein, had committed an offence punishable under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The Sub-Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Nalgonda District, furnished written instructions dated 09.06.2015 to the office of the learned Government Pleader for Home wherein he stated that upon the complaint made by the Tahasildar, Nalgonda Mandal, Crime No.108 of 2011 had been registered against the petitioner and her husband under Sections 420, 468 and 471 I.P.C., on the file of the II Town Police Station, Nalgonda. Upon investigation, a charge sheet was laid before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nalgonda, in February, 2015.

According to the Sub-Inspector of Police in the light of the crime registered against her at the behest of the Tahasildar, Nalgonda Mandal, the petitioner as a counter blast submitted the complaint dated 10.04.2011 alleging that the Tahasildar, Nalgonda Mandal, had himself committed an offence against her. An entry was made in the Station General Diary on 23.04.2011 as regards this complaint and upon due enquiry it came to light that the said complaint was made by the petitioner only to thwart the liability in Crime No.108 of 2011. In the light of this conclusion, the police authorities did not take any further action on the petitioner's complaint.

In the light of the aforestated facts, it is for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if she is aggrieved by

the conclusion arrived at by the police authorities after due enquiry into her complaint.

Reserving liberty to the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is dismissed.

Pending Miscellaneous Petitions shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date:25.06.2015 GJ