N.Rama Krishnam Raju v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.NOS.1933, 1934, 1969 AND 1991 OF 2019 COMMON ORDER The grievance of the petitioners in all these writ petitions is that the respondent authorities are trying to interfere with their possession over the subject properties for the purpose of laying road, without paying any compensation.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that this court in identical set of facts and circumstances in W.P.No.1875 of 2019 dated 01-02-2019 disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the property involved therein, without following the due process of law. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration for 1st respondent, Sri Chatla Madhu, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation for respondents 2 and 3 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for 4th respondent, do not dispute the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions of the respective counsel and the order of this court dated 01-02-2019 in W.P.No.1875 of 2019, the present writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the properties in question without following the procedure prescribed under Section 146 of Grater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, and without complying with Section 38 of Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.