Smt.Kankara Savitri, v. State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary -

134861

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 23280 OF 20'15 Between:

Smt.Kankara Savitri, S/o.Ramesh Reddy, Aged about 28 yea Household and Business, R:/o.Chanugondla Village, Owk Mandal, District.

rs, occ Kurnool ...PETITIONER AND

1. State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary -, Home Department., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Khammam Rural PS, Khammam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not initiating any further action and investigating the case after registration of the crime FIR No-34212014, dated 27.5.2014, as illegal and arbitrary LA. NO: I OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 30167 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the 2nd Respondent to immediately initiating further action and investigate into the matter in FIR No.342l2014, dated 27.5.2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. GlRl KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

.lH E HoNoITRABLE sRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAXRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2328O of 2015 ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in not initiating further action and investigating the case in Crime No.342/2OL4, which was registered on 27.05.2014 for the offence under Sections lO9, 406, 42O read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

Sri R. Giri Kumar (14666), learned counsel on record for the petitioner submitted that he has no instructions as to whether t}re said crime is still pending or not. 3.

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 placed on record written instructions dated 03.08.2015, wherein it is submitted t]lat after conducting investigation the case in Crime No.342/2O14 was closed as the entire issue for the dispute comes under the purview of 'civil in I nature' and that the police cannot proceed in civil disputes. I 4In view of the above facts and circumstances and since the cause in the writ petition does not survive, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

VRKR, J wp 23280_2015 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. OneCC to SRl. R. GlRl KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FORHOME, HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

3. Two CD Copies KKSf"

HIGH COURT DATED:21 10812025 ST4 .) 2 0 JAN ?026 I .l'.:j tl ,.. l *

ORDER

WP.No.23280 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS G-d'A w "-ftr45