P.S.A.R.V. Prasad Babu v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.13555 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A.1 in Crime No.144 of 2015 on the file of the Station House Officer, Nadendla Police Station, Guntur District, registered for the offences under Sections 409 and 420 I.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is accused No.1 and the second respondent is the de facto complainant in Crime No.144 of 2015.

4. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner was appointed as Outsourcing Work Inspector in A.P. Housing Corporation Limited. It is further alleged that he along with others misappropriated the Government money to the tune of Rs.6,06,880/- while discharging his duties as a Government employee.

5. Whether the petitioner has misappropriated the Government amount allotted for construction of the houses to the poor people or not will come to light during the course of investigation. While exercising the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint only. The Court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to probability, reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the complaint at the initial stage of investigation. The material placed before the Court i s prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

also the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in R.P.Kapoor v. [1] [2], I am of the State of Punjab and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal considered view that it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Station House Officer may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of the investigation.

8. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the Station House Officer, Nadendla Police Station, Guntur District, not to arrest the petitioner/A.1 in Crime No.144 of 2015 till completion of the investigation. The petitioner is directed to co-operate with the investigating officer during the course of investigation.

9. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

10. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 21.12.2015 Ivd [1] AIR 1960 SC 866 [2] AIR 1992 SC 604