← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/4426/2016allowed no costs

Katta Srinivasa Rao And Another v. The State Of A.P., And Another

2017-11-30M.Satyanarayana Murthy2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRL.P.MP.Nos. 13149 & 13150 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4426 OF 2016 ORDER:

CRL.P.MP.Nos. 13149 & 13150 OF 2017 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.150 of 2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Anaparthi, East Godavari District, for the offence punishable under Sections 384,323,354,506 r/w 34 IPC r/w 109 IPC.

The petitioners/A-6 & A-7 and the second respondent/ defacto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsels and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity.

A joint memo of compromise is filed by both the parties, when terms of joint memo of compromise are explained in Telugu language, they are admitted to be true and correct. It is now submitted that, the petitioners/A-6 & A-7 and the second respondent/defacto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life.

Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo

MSM,J CrlP_4426_2016 filed along with this petition. Accordingly, these petitions are ordered.

Crl.P.NO.4426 OF 2016 In view of the orders passed by this Court in CRL.P.MP.Nos. 13149 & 13150 OF 2017, this criminal petition is allowed.

Registry is directed to annex a copy of joint memo filed by both the parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:30.11.2017 SP