Kethineni Venkatrayamma. v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.782 of 2016 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

The petitioner questions the order dated 19.08.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer cancelling his pattadar passbook. The said order is clearly subjected to revision under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act and the said revision is admittedly filed by the 5th respondent. The petitioner however, questions the said order under this writ petition merely on the ground that he is not a party to the said revision. Irrespective of the fact that whether the petitioner is a party or not, he may as well questions the same, by approaching the Joint Collector by filing a revision. The impugned order itself is passed on 19.08.2015 and more than four months have already elapsed. Therefore, there is no reason why petitioner should not be relegated to the said revisional authority.

In view of the above, it is not proper to entertain this writ petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J Date: 07-01-2016 Kvrm

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.782 of 2016

Dated: 07-01-2016 kvrm