Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi v. The District Educational Officer And 3 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3301 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 3386 OF 2022 Between:
Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi, Wo Y.Janardan, Aged about 42 years, School As5t.(English) Z.P.H.School, Mamidipally, Nandigama Mandal, Rangareddy Dist. (1D.No.1431433) ...PETITIONER AND '1 . The District Educational Officer, Rangareddy District.
2. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Allocation Committee, Rangareddy Dist.
3. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Govt. of T.S. at Hyderabad.
4. The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, School Education Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Orders, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the impugned Proc.No.ES/SC/RANG/SEAAS/O070 dt.O6tO1l2O22 issued by the 1st respondent posting the petitioner at Z.P.H.S. Mamidipally of Nandigama Mandal while posting juniors or less meritorious in the places opted by her though her spouse is working as Gr.l Hostel Welfare Officer by overlooking her merit and seniority in the cadre of School Assistant even while including the candidate who came on inter-district in the year 2005 have been placed above me and posted is clearly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and set aside the same, and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to be posted in her
opted places including existing vacancies nearer to her spouse with all consequential benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the of the petitioner appeal dt.2611212021 fot posting at nearby places under spouse category working. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK trIRIT PETITION No. 3386 of 2022 ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Services-I has placed on record a copy of the proceedings in Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshil2O2l-251, dated 31.O3.2022, and submitted that in compliance of the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents have disposed of the appeal hled by the petitioner duly rejecting her case.
2l Recording the above made submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to challenge the proceedings in Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshi/2021-251, dated 31.O3.2022, if the petitioner is so advised. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No I costs.
ASs,sriRfri+YrAf[fF //TRUE COPY// \,/ SECTIOIT OFFICER I I To, 1.
2.
3.
I The District Educational Officer, Ranqareddv District. The District collector-cum-chairmanlAllocaiion committee. Ranoareddv Dist. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Covt] ot- iS. at Hyderabad.
The Principal .Secretary, School Education Dept., Secretariat, State of I elangana, Hyderabad.
One CC to SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO, Advocate. IOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court ior the'State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies.
\\y'
4.
5.
6.
I 7.
BSK SB I I l I i I I I i i I
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 stA e tl t6 ( Joo a -L 2 2 JAII 202[ * A1 a * t'
c P
ORDER
WP.No.3386 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS