Sri. Sathya Babu v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.2288 of 2019 ORDER:

Both the learned counsel submit that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.9035 of 2017 dated 15.03.2017.

Therefore, for the reasons alike, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to satisfying requirements of Section 428 of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and also giving an undertaking that he would not claim equities or costs of the building constructions, in the event LGC has been decided against him, without reference to the letter dated 31.10.2013 of the Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date: 08.02.2019 Prv

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.6867 of 2016

02-03-2016 Prv