← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/161/2021withdrawn

Myakala Mallaiah , Gundi Mallaiah v. V. Anil Kumar, Ias (Retd.)

2023-10-06Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

[ 26s71

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OcroqE-l nmo rriousnNo AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI coNTEMPT CASE NO: 161 oF 2021 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1O lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act' 1971 to punish the ,""ponaln6'n"r"in to, wilfully.and violating, disobeying tlrc orders of the High Court dai;')o'li'iots passed in W'P'No'2048\of 20 t9' Between:

Mvakala Mallaiah@ Gundi Mallaiah' S/o Kotaiah' R/o H No 5-64' Gundi Village' RimaOugu Mandai, Karimnagar District'

...Petitioner

AND

1. V. Anil Kumar, IAS (Retd')' State of Telangana' Endowments Department' ' R;;U it" piiniip"r sirre!1v, Posr{kun9:-lgej-abad

2. V. Anil Kumar' IAS (Retd')' Commisstoner Endowment Department Telangana State

3. M. Rama Krishna Roa, Deputy- Commissioner Endowments Department' * 6or"in."nt of Telangana, Bogulkunta' Hyderab^ad'

4. A. Balaji, executive'6ffrtJi"sii-ru"iriiirjunaswamv Temple' Komaravelli lVittage anA Mandal), Siddipet District'

...Respondents

counse] for the Petitioner: Sri PRABHAKAR sRIPADA.{tr Se{ N FP.lSt{t.,A Kut.{AQ Counsel for the Respondent Nos'1 to 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No'4: Sri K JAGAN MOHAN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI CONTEM PT CAS No.161 oF 2lJ21 t

ORDER

t Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Contempt Case.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

'ITRuEcoPY" tecrro*trrrcen ',.,.[t# Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pencling in this Coniempt case shal stand crosed sd,lnb?|Uflit$'S+S i'

, *o*o* REDDY' AdvocateroPUcr ; l*t*ll'""r.i* SP \T-

HIGH COURT DATED:0611012023 AlE OF

ORDER

z o ls CC.No.161 ot 2021 1\ $tt d)oo r( ll P s o I + DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE AS WITHDRAWN rr cd4 Yr- \5 \e L9