M.Srinivasa Rao v. The State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.16472 of 2017 Between:

M.Srinivasa Rao ..Petitioner and The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Hyderabad and others ..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.M.Srinivasa Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3:Government Pleader for Services I (TS) Counsel for respondent No.4: -- The Court made the following:

CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.16472 of 2017 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) Feeling aggrieved by the purported non-implementation of order, dated 09.11.2015, in O.A.No.5965 of 2015 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal'), the applicant therein filed this writ petition.

2.

By the aforementioned order, the Tribunal directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer from agency area to plain area in the vacancies that are available within four weeks from the date of receipt of the said order. According to the petitioner, the said order of the Tribunal was not complied with.

3.

On behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, the Special Chief Secretary to Government (TS), Education Department, filed a counter-affidavit, wherein he has, inter alia, stated that as far back as 29.02.2016, respondent No.3 issued appropriate proceedings in compliance with order, dated 09.11.2015, in O.A.No.5965 of 2015. A copy of the said proceedings has also been enclosed along with the counter-affidavit. 4.

Mr.M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that he has no instructions as to whether his client has received the aforementioned proceedings or not. He has, however, fairly admitted that with the issuance of the aforementioned proceedings, the order of the Tribunal stood complied with.

5.

In the light of the above facts, the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. The petitioner is, however, left free to question proceedings, dated 29.02.2016, of respondent No.3, if he feels aggrieved thereby.

CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.16472 of 2017 6.

As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.20220 and 20222 of 2017 filed by the petitioner shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J __________________________________ GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J 09th August, 2017 GHN