Gandham Bhadraiah v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.141 OF 2016 ORDER:

The petitioner filed the present Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 o0f the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved over the order dated 05.01.2016 passed in CFR. No.4033 of 2015 in Cr. No.198 of 2015 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mahabubabad.

Heard and perused the material available on record. When petitioner approached the Court below with impugned application seeking release of the seized property in the above crime i.e., 300 kgs., of black jaggery and 2425 kgs., of alum, the learned Magistrate, vide impugned order, dismissed the same on the ground of jurisdiction.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Court below has jurisdiction to entertain the above Crl.M.P. and direct the authorities concerned to release the property and that the value of the seized property will be diminished if it is kept idle in the premises of Prohibition & Excise station.

Admittedly, the seized property in the above referred crime is not a prohibited article under any law and its possession is also not barred by the provisions of any Statute.

Considering these circumstances, interim custody of 300 kgs., of black jaggery and 2425 kgs., of alum seized in the above referred crime shall be entrusted to the interim custody of the petitioner on his execution of a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mahabubabad.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.

______________ RAJA ELANGO, J January 19, 2015.

KTL