Kasu Swamy v. The State Of Telangana.,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.887 of 2026 DATE: 04.02.2026 Between:

Kasu Swamy .... Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through Police Station Jawaharnagar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

.... Respondents/Complainant

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.1201 of of Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, wherein the alleged offences are initially registered under Sections 126(2) and 115(2) of the BNS and after the death of the deceased, the same was altered to Section 103(1) of the BNS.

- 2 - 2.

The case of the prosecution is that, on 21.10.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that her husband has two wives the 1st wife Ilamma has two sons, and the complainant has one son and one daughter. Both families reside in the same locality. For the past few days, there had been frequent quarrels between Ilamma, her sons, and the deceased regarding a plot of 80 square yards, despite elders' intervention. On 13.10.2025, Ilamma's elder son Swamy obstructed the deceased on the road and assaulted him with hands, causing bleeding injuries. The locals shifted Ilaiah to Gandhi Hospital by ambulance. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, initially the police registered a case for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2) and 115(2) of the BNS and later, after the death of the deceased, the same was altered to Section 103(1) of the BNS.

3.

Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent - State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no intention to cause the death of the deceased and the

- 3 - petitioner herein is in jail since 05.11.2025 and the entire investigation was already completed and due to the disputes between the parties, the petitioner herein is falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no such investigation is pending and till today, no charge sheet is filed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to him by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner by filing counter stating that the allegation against the petitioner herein is serious in nature and the petitioner herein killed his own father. Further, the investigation is not yet completed and he is not entitled for the bail. However, he informed that no charge sheet is filed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner herein is in jail since 05.11.2025. As seen from the remand case diary, the prosecution witnesses, LWs 1 to 13 have already been examined and except filing of the charge sheet, there is no other investigation is pending.

- 4 - Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegation, the stage of investigation, the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned X Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, MedchalMalkajgiri District, at Medchal.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

- 5 - 7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 04.02.2026 TU

- 6 - THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.887 OF 2026 DATE : 04.02.2026 TU