Athram Geetanjali , And Another v. Krishnapal Singh, Allahbad Dist And Another

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD MACMAMP No.3413 OF 2017 AND M.A.C.M.A.No.1871 of 2017 COMMON JUDGMENT:

Though learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he has given details of condoning the delay of 3138 days in filing the appeal, no such day-to-day delay or any cogent reasons have been stated.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellants also submitted that the appellants will forego interest for the delay period. 3.

The 2nd respondent/insurance company filed counter vehemently opposing for condoning the inordinate delay and relied on judgment of the Apex Court in Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority and another v Gopi Chand Atreja1 that the inordinate delay and unexplained delay cannot be condoned. 4.

As there are no proper reasons explaining the inordinate delay and in view of decision of the Apex Court in Gopichand Atreja's case referred supra, the condone delay application is dismissed and accordingly, MACMA is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.

__________________________ T. AMARNATH GOUD, J Date: 20th November, 2019 KL 1 AIR 2019 SC 1423