← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/81/2022withdrawn

A. Pochaiah v. Sri Somesh Kumar, I.A.S

2022-01-28Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY 'THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY-OF J'ANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY WVO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI c N Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating the Order of the High Court dated 12-11-2021passed in W'P No 12245 ol 2021 '

Between:

A Pochaiarr e4" g?l:is,:,tfft 3t li8[sd|1] JaiPur Mandal, Mancher aibTahsildar (under susPension) ...PETITIONER AND

1. Sri Somesh Kumar, I A S' Chief Secretary to Government' Revenue ' il;J;;i,Secretariat'T S HYderabad'

2 sri somesh,KYT?'rr:l!;fi:i1l?:S.T[:'S*"J,?ILand Administration (FAC) and Chief Secretary to Govel

3. Smt.BharatiHollikeri, I A S' District Collector'Mancherial District' Mancherial' ...RESPONDENTS Gounsel for the Petitioner :SRl' V RAVICHANDRAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos' lto 3: G'P FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

t HON'BLE ;RI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVII-I C.C.No.81 OF 2022 ORDER:

01, When the mattel is taken up for hearing' learned counsel appearinr l for the petitioner seeks Permission to withdraw the contemPt cas' :.

02.

Per nission as sought for is accorded'

03.

Acr ordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Misct llaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

s d / -c H. vDE}ffYE iHB"tTH hH /iTRUE COPY// SECTION"5FFTCER ro'

Iii:r 3:l"J.t"?:[?5o t Government' Revenue t B:rt",{l.""'X, [BT;: l;.,'?ii i L]l-'^11:1"

"ner or Land Administration (FAC) and ,B'i,:iS;,:,5Hfi 't'S;?i3!ii?:8Ti:'Si"',1,:

3. Smt.BharatiHorr*, ari, r.n.s, District coilector,Mancherial District' tuancherial' ^ ly3fr"t;f,e r o' n"u"nue ' Hish Court for the State of Telansana' at

5. One CC to SRI V RAVICHANDRAN Advocate [OPUCI

6. Two CD CoPies

7. One SPare uoP Y CDL x\x

HIGH COURT DATED:28101t2022

ORDER

1rlc. S i'\ t J+ o^.

{ CC.No.81 ot 2.)22 co 1 B Fi:l 202 DISMISSING THE CON TEMPT CASE AS WITHDRAWT''-'