D. Rama Narasaiah v. The State Of Telangana
[ 32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 2389 OF 20fr Between:
D. Rama Narasaiah, S/o Rama Chandraiah, Aged 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl./o Rama Krishnapuram, Kamealli (V)(M) Khammam District. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary Revenue Dept., Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
District Collector, Khammam District, at Khammam. Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Division, Khammam Diskict The Tahsildar, Kamepalli Mandal, Khammam District.
5. Deevela Chalamma, Wo Late Ramachandraiah, Age. 76 Years, Occ. Housemaker, Rl/o H.No. 1-1 13, Ramakrishnapuram Village, Kamepally (V) and (M) Khammam District.
6. Deevela Damodar Rao, S/o Ramachandraiah, Age. 60 Years, Retired Central Government Employee, R/o H. No. 1 -'1 '1 3, Ramakrishnapuram Village. Kamepally (V) and (M) Khammam District.
7. Yaluri Jayamma, W/o Srinivasrao, Age. 61 Years, Occ. HomeMaker, Fl/o. Khammam, R|/o H.No. '1-'1 13, Ramakrishnapuram Village, Kamepally (V) and (tvl) Khammam District.
8. Yaluri Srinivasrao, Wo Anathramaiah, Age. 75 Years, Occ. Business, Fl/o H. No. 1 -1 13, Ramakrishnapuram Village, Kamepally (V) 86 (M) Khammam District.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus.duly declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in considering the wiitten objections of the petitioner dated 19.01.2025, seeking to stop the mutations of the names of the private respondents herein in respect of the property vide an extent of Acers 13.06 Guntas situated in Survey numbers 188, -dr*.
221, 226,2291A, 254tA, 295tA, 296tA. 297 tA, 2981A, 352,2121A,2121E, 214,217 , 188/A, 349/A, 342 situated at Kamepalli Village and Mandal, of Khammam District, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents 2lo 4lo consider the said representation and conduct detailed enquiry before entertaining any mutation process in respect of the above propertres in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.01.2025, seeking to stop the mutations of the names of the private respondents herein in respect of the property vide an extent of Acers 13.
06 Guntas situated in Survey numbers 188, 221 ,226,2291A, 2541A, 295tA, 296tA,297tA,298tA, 352,212tA,212tE, 214,217, 188/A, 349/A, 342 situated at Kamepalli Village and Mandal, of Khammam District, before entertaining any mutation process in respect of the above properties in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel forthe Respondents: 1 TO 4 GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondents: 5 TO 8:------ The Court made the following: ORDER
HON|BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2389 of 2025
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the written objections, date d 19.Ol .2025 submitted by the petitioner, seeking to stop the mutation of the names of the unofficial respondents in respect of the Iand admeasuring Acs.13.06 guntas situated in various survey numbers of Kamepally Viltage and Mandal, Khammam District, as illegal and arbitrary. 2.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the respondent authorities have considered the objections and issued Memo in Rc.No.B/37312021, dated 23.01 .2025. 3.
In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the Mcmo, dated 23.01.2025 and as iL is stated that the written objections submitted by the petitioner has already considered, is of the opinion that no orders need to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. 4.
As a sequel, lhe miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs 5ot-tt. SRIHA AS S NT REGISTRAR I ,,TRUE COPY"
SECTION OFFICER To, ?ffi 33Jif 3i?5SH0"'Jl.tHS-;HTYil',tf J"'?Et"??:3in""" 1.) [111, ""0'"'
3.
BN BS t/
HIGH COURT DATED:2910112025 ::_ -. -.'\r.
o 7 tr'
(.'.(
ORDER
a 2a ?-tfr i',i WP.No.2389 of 2025 * t-sn,n * -r t i,') CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS // * ,4 / t