Y. Harsha Vardhan, v. The State Of A.P.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.M.P (SR).No.3839 of 2015 in Crl.P.No.15017 of 2014 & Crl.P.No.15017 of 2014 ORDER:

The de-facto complainant and his counsel Sri K.Venumadhav are present. Accused Nos.1 to 3 and their counsel Sri B.Prakasam are present.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

The police of Eluru II Town P.S. registered FIR No.263 of 2014 against the accused for the offences under Section 384, 506 r/w 34 IPC and investigating the matter. While so, it is submitted by both parties that at the intervention of the elders, the parties have settled the matter in respect of the above crime and entered into a compromise and hence compromise may be recorded and criminal proceedings in FIR.No.263 of 2014 may be quashed in the interest of justice. Having regard to the above submission and considering the fact that the allegations are not involving grave offences and that the parties have amicably settled the dispute among themselves out of court and no useful purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to the trial as they are already compromised, and following the decision reported in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another[1] this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and compromise is recorded and consequently, proceedings in FIR No.263 of 2014 of Eluru II Town P.S are hereby quashed.

In the result, both the Petitions are accordingly disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 21.01.2015

Dsr [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303