K. Chinnaveeraswamy v. The State Of Telengana Rep.

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.(TR)Nos.5164, 5176, 5177, 5178, 5179, 5180, 5182, 5203, 5204, 5205, 5206, 5207, 5208, 5209, 5210 of 2017 COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration appearing for respondents 1, 3 & 4 and learned Government Pleader for Finance & Planning appearing for respondent No.2.

It is the case of the petitioners that they joined as NMRs/daily wage workers in Municipal Corporation, Khammam, in the year 1990 on different dates; that they have completed 29 years of service and that they are entitled for regularization of their services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994. But, so far, their services have not been regularized.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that as on today, the petitioners are working as NMRs/daily wage workers and have completed 29 years of service, and hence, their cases deserve to be considered for regularization

in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Karnakata Vs. U.Uma Devi1, wherein it was observed as under:

" One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) as explained in S.V. Narayanappa11, R.N. Nanjundappa12 and B.N. Nagarajan8 and referred to in para 15 above, of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but without the intervention of orders of the courts or of tribunals. The question of regularization of the services of such employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases above referred to and in the light of this judgment.

In that context, the Union of India, the State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularize as a one-time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of the courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed. The process must be set in motion within six months from this date.

We also clarify that regularization, if any already made, but not sub judice, need not be reopened based on this judgment, but there should be no further bypassing of the constitutional requirement and regularizing or making permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme."

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents contends that there are no vacancies in the respondent-Corporation and the petitioners have not fulfilled the conditions stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994. 1 (2006) 4 SCC 1

Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered view that ends of justice would be met if a direction is given to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization in terms of paragraph No.53 of the judgment of the Apex Court in State of Karnakata Vs. U.Uma Devi. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization in terms of the decision rendered in State of Karnakata Vs. U.Uma Devi and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 28th June, 2019 rkk