Mohd. Khan v. H.E.H. The Nizam Viii,Nawab M.B.A.K.B.,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN SEC ND APPEAL NO: 617 0F 2001 AppealunderSection'l00ofCPCagainsttheJudgmentanddecreedated 08/03/200lmadeinASNo.338oflggTonthefileoftheCourtofthelllAdditional ChiefJudge,CityCivllCourtatHyderabadpreferredagainstthedecreeinOS No.370.1 of 1994 dated 2210711997 on the file of the court of the X Assistant Judge' City Civil Court, at HYderabad.

Between:

lr,4ohd. Khan, S/o.late Subhan Khan, aged about,45 ,years' , Occ: Business at Mulgi i't;.is*-6-98, t;AeiArzatgunil/ousque, Afzalgunj, Hvderabad' ...A''ELLANT AND H.E.H. the Nizam Vlll' Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur' Rep by his GPA HrtohO.n.iorttu Khan, King Koti, Hyderabad'

...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI R.SATYANARAYANA REDDY' Advocate (NP) For the Respondent : SRI T.B'ALA MOHAN REDDY' Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGI\4ENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO.617 OF 2OO1 I JUDGMENT:

This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 08.03.200 1 in A.S.No.338 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

No representation on appellant's side. The appellant failed to pursue the matter. Therc rvas no representation on appellant's side even on 04.04.2022 though the matter was posted under the caption "for dismissaL." Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, sha11 stand closed.

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYI/ \ To SEC OFFICER 1.

2.

J4.

The llt Additional Chief Jud g!;$fi #-sd*iTii{*l,tntiji$ffi One Spare Copy 6.

Kj \\-

HIGH COURT AATED:121O412022 7tr* 51at i\ ( ,3 ,ir

JUDGMENT

ll o 2 0 JUL 2022 .\ 4+ i Dfs i, .,o ;.:'.

SA.No.617 of 2001 ,/ * I SA IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION, f, { \-'3 \()