Mohammed Aslam Khan v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.975 and 988 of 2026 DATE: 05.02.2026 Between:
Mohammed Tahera Begum .... Petitioner/accused No.3 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and another.
.... Respondents/Complainant Between:
Mohammed Aslam Khan .... Petitioner/accused No.2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and another.
.... Respondents/Complainant COMMON ORDER:
These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS) by the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 3, in the
event of their arrest in connection with FIR No.19 of 2026 of Gambhiraopet Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), r/w 3(5) of the BNS.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, on 22.01.2026, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that the de-facto complainant has two sons and he decided to perform the marriage of his elder son with one Karuvari Revathi, therefore, accused No.1 warned his son stating that he was in love with said Revathi and threatened to kill him if he marries her and later, his son informed the same to de-facto complainant. On 22-01-2026, A-1 secured his son to the house of Revathi by making phone call to him and accused Nos.1 to 3 attacked his son with a knife with an intention to kill his son and caused bleeding injuries on the back side of the neck and both hands. Hence, he requested for necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences.
3.
Heard Sri Md. Fasiuddin, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1State.
4.
The contention of the petitioners is that accused Nos.2 and 3 are parents of accused No.1 and there are no specific over acts against the petitioners herein and they are falsely implicated in this case and they are ready to cooperate with the investigation and accused No.1 was already arrested in this case. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the allegations against the petitioners are serious in nature and according to the complaint, all these accused attacked the son of the de-facto complainant, therefore, they are not entitled for anticipatory bail and prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petitions.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, the petitioners herein are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 3 and they are the parents of accused No.1 and the remand report filed by the petitioners shows that accused No.1 attacked the son of the de-facto complainant with a knife and accused Nos.2 and 3 supported accused No.1 and there are no specific over acts against the petitioners herein and the injury certificate filed
by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor shows that the injuries sustained by the son of the de-facto complainant are simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it fit to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners/ accused Nos.2 and 3, subject to the following conditions:
i.
The petitioners shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Gambhiraopet Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District, within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release them on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each, with two sureties, for the like sum each.
ii.
The petitioners shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.
iii.
The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every Monday between 09:00 a.m, and 05:00 p.m., for a period of 8 weeks or till the filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier, and thereafter, as and when required.
7.
Accordingly, both the Criminal Petitions are allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 05.02.2026 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.975 and 988 of 2026 Date: 05.02.2026 TU