Syed Faheem v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.17586 of 2014 in Crl.P.No.16027 of 2014 and Crl.P.No.16027 of 2014 Common Order:

T h e defacto complainant and her counsel M/s.A.Maheswari are present. Accused and his counsel M/s.Mohd. Mumtaz Pasha are present.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

On the complaint given by defacto complainant, the Police of Central Crime Station P.S registered a case in FIR No.214 of 2012 against the accused for the offences under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC r/w 34 IPC and investigation is stated to be pending.

While-so, now the submission of both sides it that at the intervention of elders, both parties have amicably resolved their disputes and in fact the complainant and the A.1, who is her husband have resolved their disputes and in view of the same, the complainant decided to withdraw the proceedings in FIR No.214 of 2012 on the file of Central Crime Station P.S and hence, permission may be accorded to them to enter into compromise and record the compromise and quash the proceedings in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission and

considering that the fact that it is a family dispute wherein the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and now the complainant is willing to withdraw the proceedings in FIR No.214 of 2012 on the file of Central Crime Station P.S and further considering that no useful purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to enquiry in the said case and following the decision reported in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another[1], this petition is allowed, permission is accorded and compromise is recorded in terms of the accompanying memorandum of compromise and consequently, the proceedings in FIR No.214 of 2012 on the file of Central Crime Station P.S are hereby quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 05.02.2015 scs [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303